Van Diemen’s Land
Oscar Redding, Jason Glover, Thomas Wright, Paul Ashcroft, Arthur Angel, Mark Winter
A visionary interpretation of the haunting tale of Australia's most notorious convict.
That this extraordinarily mature and accomplished work is the feature debut of a twentysomething director is difficult to believe; that it achieved its visual richness and epic feel on a pittance of a budget should be a wake-up call to any filmmaker who has ever pled poverty as justification for lack of polish. A film at once headily close-up in its attention to its characters' emotions, and sweeping in its depiction of their vast, untamed surroundings, Van Diemen's Land evokes no lesser titles than Apocalypse Now, Deliverance and Badlands. Like those illustrious predecessors, it weaves elements of genre horror into a profound meditation upon individual versus collective moral responsibility, the motivations for violence, and the confrontation between man and hostile nature. Based upon the grim true story of cannibal convict Alexander Pearce, the film was shot in the Franklin River area of Tasmania, a spectacular wilderness that remains broadly unaltered since Pearce's time. Pearce was an Irish farmhand from County Fermanagh who was deported to Van Diemen's Land (as Tasmania was then known) in 1819 for the theft of six pairs of shoes. In 1822, along with a small band of other Scottish, Irish and English convicts, he made a break from the Sarah Island penal colony. Conditions were harsh, supplies nonexistent, and – as the film slowly reveals – Pearce was prepared to abandon all principles, loyalties and taboos in order to survive. This monstrous figure is lent a strange poignancy here by Oscar Redding's powerful lead performance, and by a finely-judged script, co-written by Redding and director Jonathan auf der Heide. Beneath the film's sensational, gory adventure narrative churns another story: one of men without women, displaced from any domestic sphere and thus from any meaningful moral structure. No woman is glimpsed; indeed, in a salty aside that exemplifies the film's enjoyably dastardly sense of humour, one of the band dismisses the whole other gender thus: "If they didn't have c***s, you'd throw stones at them." Without sex (and implicitly in place of it), there is violence. "A man with no blood on his hands is no man," notes Pearce in his minimal voiceover, spoken in Irish Gaelic. This being a project that brooked no half-measures, Redding learned the language from scratch for the film.
2009 Archive
Festival Diary: June
Find Films By Strand
EIFF is split into Strands. Use them to help find your films.
Event Search
Suggest-o-tron
Use this fun gadget to help you navigate the Festival programme and find your festival feet.
Start Suggest-o-tron
Comments
Login or Register to post / report comments
#1 Phil Smith / Saturday 20 June, 2009 / 23:43 GMT
My only disappointment is that the Q&A at the end revealed the equally fascinating aftermath of the plot's events that couldn't have been comfortably inserted into the film.
#2 Mike Hall / Monday 13 July, 2009 / 22:01 GMT
Despite its’ simplicity, it’s an affecting tale, helped by the sparse, evocative and apologetic “I’m a quiet man” voice-over that threads its way through the narrative, holding together the otherwise un-holdable. It’s very much ‘in-your-face’ as there’s little historical explanation, and only the vaguest sense of any future ahead, which compels you to focus on the here-and-now. The score is haunting, and the film is beautifully shot, with bleached-out greens emphasizing the unforgiving nature of their surroundings and predicament.
The trailer gives a good indication of what to expect, including two of the more iconic sequences that stayed with me long afterwards – one scene where the group are running time-lapsed and ghost-like through the forest trying to escape their pursuers, the other the shockingly swift brutality with which the second inmate on the menu meets his maker.
On the downside, I struggled to hear some of the heavily-accented dialogue (especially when the speaker was off screen), and it was hard to believe that there were no other nutritious animals in a rainforest, bar a solitary snake. Given their limited resources, quite how they would have caught them is another matter, but they’d have sure as hell tried, to save from eating each other.
I came out feeling like I’d been badly mauled after 12 rounds in a ring with an enormous and unbeatable foe. It’s a real powerhouse of a film that I would most certainly recommend, even though one viewing is quite sufficient for me in this lifetime. 7/10.